From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 04:33:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED1316A4CE; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:33:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B4643D31; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:33:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from melfina.ninth-nine.com ([IPv6:2002:d312:f91e::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/NinthNine) with ESMTP id i29CXhKJ072308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:33:44 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:33:44 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200403091233.i29CXhKJ072308@sakura.ninth-nine.com> From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: bug-cvs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200403091117.i29BHaKI070552@sakura.ninth-nine.com> References: <200403091117.i29BHaKI070552@sakura.ninth-nine.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org cc: peter@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: add cvs -W option to disable -R/CVSREADONLYFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:33:47 -0000 On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:17:34 +0900 (JST) Norikatsu Shigemrua wrote: > >Synopsis: add cvs -W option to disable -R/CVSREADONLYFS > >Description: > I added a feature which is to nagate a effect of -R/CVSREADONLYFS > to cvs as -W option. Please review and commit. Although I am checkout-ing well by using cvs -R in ~/.cvsrc, when I want to commit, It is prevented by -R. So I wanted to disable this feature. Although control by the environment variable CVSREADONLYFS was also considered, honestly it is troublesome. I was pointed out by some people. 1. What to control by alias? Yes, I forgot it. But I think it is troublesome. 2. There is a different from -R -W and -W -R. Is this OK? 3. This patch is not commited by cvshome. So you should avoid description of -W option? I think so.