Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:23:54 +0200
From:      Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rpcbind, rpc.statd memory footprint
Message-ID:  <20101026132354.GA79188@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
In-Reply-To: <ia6jrk$8bb$1@dough.gmane.org>
References:  <ia6jrk$8bb$1@dough.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:08:06PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> I'm not sure what to expect from these (i.e. what is "normal" in this
> case?) but the VM sizes for the NFS-used rpc.statd and rpcbind here look
> a bit too big, compared to their resident sizes:
> 
>   778 root             1  44    0 26420K  3256K select  1   0:01  0.00%
> rpcbind
>   891 root             1  44    0   263M  1296K select  1   0:01  0.00%
> rpc.statd
> 
> This is 8-stable amd64. Could there be a memory leak somewhere,
> especially in rpc.statd?

FAQ:  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html#STATD-MEM-LEAK

(Short version: That is expected behaviour from rpc.statd)

-- 
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
ertr1013@student.uu.se



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101026132354.GA79188>