From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 3 20:31:39 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8483B37B401; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 20:31:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from axp.csl.sri.com (axp.csl.sri.com [130.107.2.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A5C43EA9; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 20:31:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hogsett@axp.csl.sri.com) Received: from axp.csl.sri.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by axp.csl.sri.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h044VXKl035417; Fri, 3 Jan 2003 20:31:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hogsett@axp.csl.sri.com) Message-Id: <200301040431.h044VXKl035417@axp.csl.sri.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability In-Reply-To: Message from Jukka Simila of "04 Jan 2003 05:16:56 +0100." <1041653815.7534.9.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 8.8 (Time Passed Me By)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 20:31:33 -0800 From: Mike Hogsett Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I haven't seen FBSD 4.7 system with uptime > 1000 days, for quite > obvious reasons.. Should I recommend everyone to install FBSD 2.2.8 > since it has good uptime records? :) Sorry to step into the middle of a thread here, but to me it says that FreeBSD has had, and likely continues to have, a very good development and testing process for several years now, if not longer. This is my justification for using FreeBSD for all of my core services while my users demand Linux on the desktop. # uname -a FreeBSD buzby 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #3: Thu Sep 20 13:16:52 PDT 2001 root@buzby:/usr/src/sys/compile/PRI-NIS i386 # uptime 8:29PM up 433 days, 11:24, 1 user, load averages: 0.01, 0.00, 0.00 - Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message