Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:48:49 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, obrien@FreeBSD.org, all-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, legacy-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT access.ports Message-ID: <20030208034849.CEA2E2A8B4@canning.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <20030208024751.GA42535@turquoise>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tim Vanderhoek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:10:24PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> [...]
> > > How will you keep current with ports developments? (Things like structure
,
> > > procedures and so on?)
> >
> > .. and ports tree freezes.
>
> Which should, if memory serves, be sent to developers@, not cvs-ports@.
Yes, but the addresses are the same. If your only existence in the
access* lists is a "devnull" address, you dont get developers email either.
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030208034849.CEA2E2A8B4>