From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 2 19:53:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B96D37B4CF for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 19:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15203; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:53:14 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA19660; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:53:14 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200011030353.OAA19660@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: "Mars Attack" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.1.1-Stable In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 03 Nov 2000 11:48:49 +0800. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 14:53:14 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > is there still a cvs repository (internat) that still has = > 4.1.1-STABLE and not 4.2-BETA? 4.2Beta is still very buggy.. Any repository that has 4.2Beta will have 4.1.1-STABLE. And 4.1.1-Stable is a name that refers to a continuing evolution of the product, not a single version. And they are almost exactly the same code, so the Beta is no more buggy than the later -Stable versions. Please do not distribute unfounded bias or rumour as if it were fact. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message