Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:16:42 +0000
From:      Nick Barnes <Nick.Barnes@pobox.com>
To:        "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: execl() after fork() in signal handler - strange things happen :) 
Message-ID:  <33467.1017415002@thrush.ravenbrook.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from =?koi8-r?Q?=E2=C5=D2=A3=DA=CB=CF_=E9=D7=C1=CE?= <iberiozko@infodom.ru>  of "Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:22:31 %2B0300." <3649F9FBD2621F4498A022E513C5CA2101528B@falcon.win.infodom.ru> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've taken this over to -questions (the answer is: the signal is
blocked in the handler, and that mask is inherited by first the child
and then the execl'd process, so of course the new process can't see
SIGHUP).

Nick Barnes
Ravenbrook Limited

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33467.1017415002>