Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 18:31:20 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Volker Stolz <vs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk? Message-ID: <409673D8.6080807@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <200405031820.55622.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20040503122023.GF27940@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <409668B4.30901@fillmore-labs.com> <200405031751.00676.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200405031820.55622.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Monday 03 May 2004 17:51, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >>On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: >> >>>Michael Nottebrock wrote: >>> >>>>So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port >>>>maintainers serves no purpose? >>> >>>It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before* >>>including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not. >> >>No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in security/pinentry >>*after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time. > > ...at least this _used_ to work when I made the port, it doesn't anymore. :-/ <http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk#rev1.365>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?409673D8.6080807>