Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 01:51:42 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: jc@irbs.com, mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dog Sloooow SMP Message-ID: <199811290951.BAA00828@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 08 Nov 1998 13:43:52 %2B1100." <199811080243.NAA32642@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >No idea. I've received verification that fixing this for all 686-class > >CPUs seems to work (ie. it's OK on the Cyrix MII and doesn't appear to > >impact performance there), so the tests are now generalised for the > >entire 686-class. > > It's only OK for MII's because of various `#if 0's and `#ifdef SMP's > that prevent non-OK code from running on MII's. Care to comment on which operations aren't OK? I did ask for this in the review phase, with no feedback. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811290951.BAA00828>