Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:57:56 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, kellydeanch@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Why is procfs deprecated in favor of procstat? Message-ID: <20110223085755.GA1749@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20110221174100.GA77744@icarus.home.lan> References: <457880.36028.qm@web121501.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <201102211707.p1LH7c8n075660@lurza.secnetix.de> <20110221174100.GA77744@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:41:00AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > For years now I have been considering a sysctl filesystem (e.g. mounted > as /sysctl) which would solve this dilemma. Read-only might be a wise > choice for this too. But this is beyond my skill set at this time, and > the existing documentation/examples for a pseudo filesystem are really > not that great. http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org/msg38829.html :) --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk1kzBMACgkQForvXbEpPzRD/ACgtosebYGuPGiWDdFqC2pphTxH Ef0AoPnH3OF1elqdDMgWYWoZGfyZvsFc =AfkQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110223085755.GA1749>