Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Feb 2019 09:01:53 -0800
From:      Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r344316 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs
Message-ID:  <1235DF70-2954-4421-9CF3-AA0538B24720@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190220075613.GC84455@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201902192335.x1JNZu53080578@repo.freebsd.org> <20190219234328.wrmteippr6vbg2fr@mutt-hbsd> <20190220075613.GC84455@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Feb 19, 2019, at 23:56, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 06:43:28PM -0500, Shawn Webb wrote:
>> At the risk of painting a bikeshed a lovely color of neon purple, I'm
>> curious about if/how these types of commits get merged upstream to
>> (OpenZFS|Illumos|ZFS On Linux|where ever ZFS upstream is now|I'm very
>> confused|is anyone else confused where upstream is?).
>>=20
>> Who is upstream? Is work like this going to remain as a downstream
>> patch to ZFS? Or is FreeBSD going to work to upstream this type of
>> work?
>=20
> I've always felt that we should've become upstream to everyone else
> the moment we knew Oracle would eat Sun (20 April 2009), and never
> understood why it didn't happen and now, ten years later, we're talking
> about ZFS on fucking Linux becoming our upstream.  Something'd got very
> wrong here and I'd like to know what and why.

As others have pointed out, FreeBSD has less developer inertia than Linux, a=
nd there are (seemingly) less developers or interested parties in running an=
 openindiana based stack.

Also: better OS support for other general purpose infrastructure/usecases wi=
th items like multitenancy via containerization/CGroups2, Java, etc, and min=
dshare around this and other things.

The only thing really holding ZoL back in Linux is the fact that (due to lic=
ensing) it won=E2=80=99t ever be in the Linux kernel.

-Enji=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1235DF70-2954-4421-9CF3-AA0538B24720>