From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Fri Apr 7 15:04:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CBBD32795 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9154838D for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [217.29.44.10]) by gate2.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id v37F4nlp025222 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:04:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.29.46.2] ([217.29.46.2]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v37F4nT4068498 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:04:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) From: "Patrick M. Hausen" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: iSCSI/ZVOL: ZFS or UFS on the initiator side? Message-Id: <35CF60B2-097A-4381-9B4A-ABF2B9BBC0B9@punkt.de> Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:04:43 +0200 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:04:53 -0000 Hi, all, a general question: If I export a ZVOL via iSCSI to be used be another FreeBSD machine as a block device, is it advisable to use ZFS or should I stick to UFS? I don't have any reason to believe that ZFS might be harmful. I just know from experience, that e.g. tunneling TCP through TCP can lead to strange effects if you happen to really have packet-loss. Anything similar for ZFS in ZFS? What if iSCSI target (ZVOL) and initiator are on the same machine? They'll share ZIL and ARC. What if memory gets low? I'm investigatiing the feasibility of creating a HA setup by running a mirror (ZFS or gmirror/UFS) on top of 2 iSCSI ZVOLs, one on the local machine but still via ISCSI, one on a remote machine ... TIA for your opinion and advice, Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 info@punkt.de http://www.punkt.de Gf: J=C3=BCrgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285