From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 21:40:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1194416A41A for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBE313C46A for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m17Le2ZD009855 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m17Le2Ld009854; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:40:02 GMT Message-Id: <200802072140.m17Le2Ld009854@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jarrod Sayers Cc: Subject: Re: ports/120331: net-mgmt/nrpe2: [PATCH]: update 2.7 -> 2.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jarrod Sayers List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:40:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/120331; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jarrod Sayers To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, pgollucci@p6m7g8.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/120331: net-mgmt/nrpe2: [PATCH]: update 2.7 -> 2.8 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:07:12 +1030 The reason for the garbage characters is unknown though is still being looked into. I see no reason to mark the port as broken for SSL just to push it up to 2.10, short of a compelling functional incompatibility or security reason. As you could imagine, a large number of users use it's SSL features and I need to look after them too ;-) Jarrod.