Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 18:22:53 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org> To: Erwin Lansing <erwin@lansing.dk> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/38946: maintainer-update www/p5-Apache-ASP 2.33 to 2.35 Message-ID: <20020606162253.GF71895@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <20020606180126.A54229@mail.droso.net> References: <200206061453.g56ErTV59197@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020606180126.A54229@mail.droso.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 06:01:26PM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 07:53:29AM -0700, tobez@FreeBSD.org wrote:
> > First of all, thanks for your work on FreeBSD ports.
> > Secondly, I've got to ask you why do you keep ignoring requests to
> > submit the patches that apply cleanly?
> Because I should have been reading Using the vi Editor instead of
> updating ports :(
> I hope the attached diff is better. Sorry about that.
Yeps, it's good. Thanks!
> About your other point. Most perl-ports I've seen need:
> RUN_DEPENDS= ${BUILD_DEPENDS}
> which portlint isn't too happy about. Any hints are appreciated.
Oh, this one may be safely ignored. In general, one should not bend
over to satisfy portlint. If a particular warning can be solved easily,
then it is probably a good idea to do so. If you feel you are right and
portlint is wrong, never mind portlint.
Cheers,
=Anton.
--
| Anton Berezin | FreeBSD: The power to serve |
| catpipe Systems ApS _ _ |_ | http://www.FreeBSD.org |
| tobez@catpipe.net (_(_|| | tobez@FreeBSD.org |
| +45 7021 0050 | Private: tobez@tobez.org |
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020606162253.GF71895>