Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:04:56 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libfetch kqueue patch Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011126150427.96404B-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200111262001.fAQK15b21599@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Agreed, or people could code with select in a nice manner and dynamically allocate the fd_set arrays. On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote: :<<On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 13:02:23 +0200, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> said: : :> For what it's worth, it also makes code less portable. : :On the other hand, it would also make libfetch useful in a larger :variety of applications; viz., those which have so many file :descriptors open that the one used by libfetch will overflow the :default fd_set. : :-GAWollman : : :To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org :with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message : -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011126150427.96404B-100000>