Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:58:42 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Pekala <pawel@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r375258 - head/comms/owfs
Message-ID:  <20141223095842.GJ43454@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20141223083257.GA68118@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201412221837.sBMIbwow087403@svn.freebsd.org> <20141223020542.GA27018@FreeBSD.org> <20141223081644.GH43454@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20141223083257.GA68118@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--HcccYpVZDxQ8hzPO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 08:32:57AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 02:05:42AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 06:37:58PM +0000, Pawel Pekala wrote:
> > > Why does it use bogus "gmake:lite"?  I'd really want to see these
> > > obnoxious *-lite ports gone.  I didn't find the reasoning for :lite
> > > in the PR, did I miss it (if yes, how feasible would it be to fix it
> > > properly)?
> >=20
> > gmake:lite is only usefull and should only be used to avoid chicken/egg
> > problems basically it has been created for anything gmake can depend on
> > which may itself only be buildable with gmake (textinfo for example) it
> > should not at all be used in all other cases.
>=20
> How feasible would be to patch textinfo and friends from gnumake'isms?  I
> am willing to investigate; having a separate `devel/gmake-lite' leaf port
> both looks strange and people would want to use it without giving it much
> thought.

I haven't spent much time on it. just did a quick look and figured out that=
 was
not that easy iirc.
>=20
> ./danfe
>=20
> P.S.  Baptiste, what had happened to your comma key recently?  It would be
> a lot easier to read through your letters if you would've used them.
>=20
It has been eaten by my cat :)

Bapt

--HcccYpVZDxQ8hzPO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlSZPNIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExZegCgo4S5jt8m/roV+Kwm82sA8O6j
dP0An3UgIOKPQEF9HXJaVZ+LVRVAFU5i
=/UNX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HcccYpVZDxQ8hzPO--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141223095842.GJ43454>