Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:32:38 +0200 From: Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystems Message-ID: <6FC7D45F-9B73-4821-B977-AC982BE2D78E@boosten.org> In-Reply-To: <4C9DA891.7030706@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4C9D0499.3050908@cox.net> <4C9D146C.10009@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4C9DA5AA.4020606@boosten.org> <4C9DA891.7030706@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 sep 2010, at 09:45, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 25/09/2010 08:32:58, Peter Boosten wrote: >> On 24-9-2010 23:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 24/09/2010 21:05:45, Derek Funk wrote: >>>> There was a post some time ago someone was complaining that FreeBSD >>>> still uses and archaic filesystem and not a new FS like ext4. Some >>>> replied, seeming like a code contributor, with a very sounded = reply.=20 >>>> What is that reply? >>>=20 >>> ZFS >>>=20 >>> or words to that effect. Linux has nothing comparable. >>>=20 >>=20 >> http://www.osnews.com/story/23416/Native_ZFS_Port_for_Linux >>=20 >> :-) >=20 > Yes. Quoting that very page: >=20 I know... my reply was just to treat the issue lightly. That's what the = smiley was for. Thanks for your reply. --=20 Peter Boosten http://www.boosten.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6FC7D45F-9B73-4821-B977-AC982BE2D78E>