From owner-freebsd-multimedia Tue Mar 25 13:50:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA12775 for multimedia-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:50:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from uhf.wdc.net (uhf.wdc.net [198.147.74.44]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA12726 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (bad@localhost) by uhf.wdc.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA14750; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 16:47:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 16:47:16 -0500 (EST) From: Bernie Doehner To: Amancio Hasty cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OSS In-Reply-To: <199703252038.MAA13147@rah.star-gate.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-multimedia@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > We will use 3.0 -current as the development OS. I got hammer real good in > the past for being a rev or two behind. > Was afraid of that. I guess that's why development and production aren't synonymous. Problem is, I don't currently have a mchine I can truely dedicate to development. How stable is 3.0-current (my only choice would be to install it on a production machine)? Has the network device driver changed (again?)? Is there a list of core programs/objects that I'll have to deal with if I upgrade to 3.0-current? Thanks and sorry for the noise of what's supposed to be multimedia talk! Bernie