Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:40:02 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, phabric-admin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for IPv4 subnet route migration Message-ID: <201802281940.w1SJe2bC021561@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <CAFMmRNxeXgimU0p693db=t1ZU=3cyKgU8R8i8oFqpNFzpAE%2BDQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Currently, the FreeBSD stack gets itself into a bizarre state if you > try to change the source IP for a subnet route (yes, this implies > using two IPs on the same subnet on a system. Yes, I'm aware this is > a Bad Idea(TM). Unfortunately I have a customer that insists on this > configuration) > > You can see the review description for all of the gory details. IPv6 > is not affected by the issue so I only had to fix IPv4. The review is > here: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14547 > > If anybody is interested in reviewing this fix, please subscribe > yourself to the review. Thanks! Herald for umbralla Network seems to be broken, this review touches sys/netinet code which should of tripped that rule. Can someone investigate? I have manually subscribed. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201802281940.w1SJe2bC021561>