Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:45:34 +0930 (CST)
From:      Trevor Nichols <data@sb101.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   routing problems locally
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010230940140.47354-100000@ocdi.sb101.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

I don't know what causes it but the routing that's automatically generated
for rl0 IP addresses is bad causing the machine to not be able to use any
of the local addresses.

[20:11:29 (root@cjhost):~]# netstat -rn
Routing tables

Internet:
Destination        Gateway            Flags     Refs     Use     Netif
Expire
default            209.61.157.193     UGSc       71     3488      rl0
64.39.10.136       64.39.10.136       UH          0        0      rl0 =>
64.39.10.136/32    link#1             UC          0        0      rl0
64.39.10.137       64.39.10.137       UH          0        0      rl0 =>
64.39.10.137/32    link#1             UC          0        0      rl0
64.39.10.138       64.39.10.138       UH          0        0      rl0 =>
64.39.10.138/32    link#1             UC          0        0      rl0
64.39.10.139       0:e0:7d:8c:a1:a    UHLW        2       25      lo0 =>
64.39.10.139/32    link#1             UC          0        0      rl0
64.39.10.140       64.39.10.140       UH          0        0      rl0 =>
64.39.10.140/32    link#1             UC          0        0      rl0
127.0.0.1          127.0.0.1          UH          8    74045      lo0

You'll notice the gateway for 64.39.10.136 is 64.39.10.136, same with all
except .139.  I did 'route delete -host 64.39.10.139' and it recreated it
as shown above.

I can't ping .136 or anything but I can now ping .139.

The machine is a FreeBSD 3.4 machine.  We are planning to upgrade soon.

[20:17:06 (root@cjhost):~]# ifconfig -a
rl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        inet 209.61.157.228 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 209.61.157.255
        inet 64.39.10.136 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 64.39.10.255
        inet 64.39.10.137 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 64.39.10.255
        inet 64.39.10.138 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 64.39.10.255
        inet 64.39.10.139 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 64.39.10.255
        inet 64.39.10.140 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 64.39.10.255
        ether 00:e0:7d:8c:a1:0a
        media: autoselect
        supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX
<half-duplex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP
<half-duplex>

Should we have these IP addresses on lo0 instead of rl0?

Any suggestions much appreciated (because I don't want to have to do route
delete -host IP all the time :)

-Trev.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010230940140.47354-100000>