Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 18:01:58 -0500 From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com> To: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version of BIND in -stable Message-ID: <199605252301.SAA12401@sierra.zyzzyva.com> In-Reply-To: gpalmer's message of Sat, 25 May 1996 20:45:56 %2B0100. <6459.833053556@palmer.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Randy Terbush wrote in message ID > <199605251924.OAA08328@sierra.zyzzyva.com>: > > Has anyone considered upgrading sources for BIND in -stable? > > Last I looked it was a fairly old (and buggy) version. > > Dunno. I thought it had come across? Oops. I was wrong. Ok. I wouldn't > have any objections. > > > newsyslog > > What newsyslog? I thought I had grabbed source for /usr/sbin/newsyslog from -current Perhaps I drug it over from NetBSD. Something I had gotten used to having and miss in -stable. > > compat code > > Compat code? You mean the linux emu? If so, then no. The changes are > too far reaching in the kernel and make the change quite risky. Understandable. One of those things making me want to jump the fence for -current. > > devfs > > Devfs isn't anywhere close to being ready for the big time, and it > requires umpteen changes throughout the kernel, some of which don't > work as they should. So: NO. Again, I understand. Wish in one hand....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605252301.SAA12401>