Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:27:51 +0100 From: Koop Mast <kwm@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/webkit-gtk2 Makefile ports/www/webkit-gtk2/files patch-add-gzip patch-webkitnetworkresponse Message-ID: <1261607271.1881.15.camel@headache.rainbow-runner.nl> In-Reply-To: <20091223204905.GA33365@FreeBSD.org> References: <200912232017.nBNKHVOJ059440@repoman.freebsd.org> <20091223204905.GA33365@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 20:49 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:17:31PM +0000, Koop Mast wrote: > > kwm 2009-12-23 20:17:31 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > www/webkit-gtk2 Makefile > > Added files: > > www/webkit-gtk2/files patch-add-gzip > > patch-webkitnetworkresponse > > Log: > > Look in LOCALBASE for flex, so we don't pick up the version from base. [1] > > > > PR: ports/141859 [1] > > Weird, PR does not say what is exactly broken with flex(1) from the > base. Could you enlighten us why the port cannot be patched so > third-party alternative from ports for existing tool in the base is > required? Thanks. > > ./danfe > First the webkit port already depended on flex. Since the configure script wants version at least 2.5.33, we need to depend on the port. The problem is detection of the flex binary. Without the patch mentioned in the pr, the port system can pick up the base flex, if the port flex isn't installed. So tell the port to look in localbase for the port flex. -Koop
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1261607271.1881.15.camel>