Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Apr 1995 21:16:25 +0700
From:      "Nickolay N. Dudorov" <nnd@gw.itfs.nsk.su>
To:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Ipfw/Ipacct questions
Message-ID:  <199504161416.VAA01173@gw.itfs.nsk.su>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>       Ipfirewall/Ipaccounting code in current
>>only partially enabled/disabled by IPFIREWALL/IPACCT kernel
>>config options. Why does this code contains run time tests
>>(f.e. if(ip_acct_cnt_ptr == NULL) ) when I config kernel
>>without IPFIREWALL/IPACCT ? Is it possible to #ifdef all
>
>   Because ipfw is also an LKM.
>
>-DG

	The next question - is it possible/feasible to
build a kernel which'll not allow modload 'ipfw' LKM ?
It seems to me that such a situation was here some time ago
with IBCS2 support - i.e. I have to define option IBCS2 (?)
for later use of IBCS2-support LKMs.

	N.Dudorov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504161416.VAA01173>