Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:55:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) Message-ID: <200309261455.h8QEtTQc098661@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKOEMMGOAA.davids@webmaster.com> References: <200309250710.41607.davidxu@FreeBSD.org> <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKOEMMGOAA.davids@webmaster.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:33:06 -0700, "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> said: > think '-pthread' is a good thing. It's nice to have a portable way to say > that I want to compile POSIX code. What good is a standard if there's no > standard way to get to it? The Standard way to do it is: c99 foo.c -l pthread -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309261455.h8QEtTQc098661>