Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:43:40 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why are so many people using 4.x?
Message-ID:  <20060328224340.GA4063@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <4429B479.7000408@pixelhammer.com>
References:  <200603281234.11850.satyam@sklinks.com> <4429A37D.2020500@pixelhammer.com> <20060328213953.GA2682@xor.obsecurity.org> <4429B479.7000408@pixelhammer.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 05:11:05PM -0500, DAve wrote:

> >Really you want to use 6.0 or 6.1 on any new system, simply because
> >that's the modern, supported version of FreeBSD.
> >
> >Kris
>=20
> I get frightened when something is no longer "modern" when it is less=20
> than a year old. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/announce.html
> Good reasons to recommend 6.X would be "bug FOO is fixed", "hardware FOO=
=20
> is now fully supported", "FOO is now a kernel module and can be unloaded=
=20
> or loaded at will", "disk performance is gazillion% better", etc.

If it makes you happy, all of those things are also true.

Kris
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEKbwbWry0BWjoQKURAruuAKDNUUyV+qZCWqAjUgU4yT8DFYDDyQCglOnt
aiF3mUgRu++do77ST3s3y1s=
=GE5x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060328224340.GA4063>