Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:35:40 -0500 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gmirror disks vs partitions Message-ID: <FEC5205D-24F0-4751-B592-C149AA37809C@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <20070118234251.53fd7c8e@vixen42> References: <20070117103935.GC4018@genius.tao.org.uk> <B9638CACBA387E48927BB56B6A1555070D9E41@svr1.irtnog.org> <cb5206420701170603u176ee53creff1ecbc8a5f5fbd@mail.gmail.com> <d763ac660701171715k54f88b32gb7bd45364ed2505@mail.gmail.com> <20070118234251.53fd7c8e@vixen42>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-7--190704168 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:42 AM, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > When ZFS comes available, I plan to actually run it across multiple > mirrors. It has built in JBOD, but it does not do mirroring. It just > does stripping. I think you misunderstand ZFS. It is robust against multiple disk failures. It doesn't do full disk mirroring, but does place multiple copies of data on multiple drives. --Apple-Mail-7--190704168--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FEC5205D-24F0-4751-B592-C149AA37809C>