From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 22 21:18:32 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5195AC75;
 Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:18:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from diana.db.net (unknown [IPv6:2620:64:0:1:223:7dff:fea2:c8f2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3882D27B1;
 Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:18:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from night.db.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by diana.db.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978142AA4A6;
 Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:18:27 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by night.db.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 2FB521CC93; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:18:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:18:28 -0400
From: Diane Bruce <db@db.net>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Subject: Re: Any chances to reduce number of gcc ports/packages which are
 installed as BINARY PACKAGES dependencies?
Message-ID: <20140722211828.GA98309@night.db.net>
References: <466003436.20140717005829@serebryakov.spb.ru>
 <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407212305390.6423@tuna.site>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407212305390.6423@tuna.site>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>,
 freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:18:32 -0000

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> >  Maybe, we should encourage ports, which is needed gcc, to use only one
> >  version? If many ports needs 4.8, maybe, we should bump "any" version to
> >  4.8 for gcc-less systems? And move all other versions to 4.8?
> 
> I would love to do that, in fact, I hope that at one point we can
> eventually get rid of USE_GCC=any.
> 
> What I can do for now, and have been planning to do for a few weeks,
> is https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192025 aka
> "Update default version of GCC (USE_GCC=yes, lang/gcc,...) to GCC 4.8".

Any chance we could have a script "gfortran" which by default
ran the default gcc from bsd.default-versions.mk and make.conf ?

..
> 
> Gerald
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

-- 
- db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db