Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:20:54 +0100 From: Christophe =?ISO-8859-1?B?UHLpdm90YXV4?= <c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr> To: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de> Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Fore and VPI>0 Message-ID: <20020118132054.0a8a7153.c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr> In-Reply-To: <20020118123709.S97177-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> References: <20020118123549.29986c29.c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr> <20020118123709.S97177-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:41:48 +0100 (CET) Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de> wrote: > Well, I would like to, but my feeling is, that there is nobody in the > comitter team, who cares much about ATM. For the beginning I release it > as a source package for -current. Porting it to -stable would probably > possible, but not easy, because netgraph has evolved alot. > > I'm just finishing the CLIP module and the SNMP daemon. When this is > ready, I'm going to make a first release. Well I am a it wary of using -current system in a production environment this is why I suggested -stable or -release And to answer Taavi Talvik's comments , I think it is a catch 22 situation there can only be more supported hardware if people use ATM in FreeBSD and they can only use it if there are more hardware supported. The reason is simple IMHO, many people will look at what IS currently supported under FreeBSD in order to purchase adequate hardware. Of course I am talking about users and not develloper ,because not every user of FreeBSD is also a develloper. -- =================================================================== Christophe Prevotaux Email: c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr HEXANET SARL URL: http://www.hexanet.fr/ =================================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020118132054.0a8a7153.c.prevotaux>