Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:10:00 GMT From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/184648: Regression: some comments in calendar OK in 9.1, fail in 10.0-BETA4 Message-ID: <201312100110.rBA1A0VH070305@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/184648; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, Diane Bruce <db@db.net> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/184648: Regression: some comments in calendar OK in 9.1, fail in 10.0-BETA4 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:08:08 -0500 On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: >... > I assume it's yet another problem from changing the compiler & thus cpp. This assumption is wrong. It likely originates from the addition of cpp like behavior to calendar itself. db@, can you please have a look? -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201312100110.rBA1A0VH070305>