Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:44:40 -0800 From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> To: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: Freebsd hackers list <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Should DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS messages be reported as bugs? Message-ID: <567B4E08.1000204@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <CE48BB9B-2FB0-4427-AC5E-4F0EDAAC8CC4@cs.huji.ac.il> References: <567791E9.50207@rawbw.com> <56779542.8020205@rawbw.com> <1331010544.139156804.1450706805234.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <CE48BB9B-2FB0-4427-AC5E-4F0EDAAC8CC4@cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/22/2015 01:34, Daniel Braniss wrote: > I have been using unionfs for a very long time, mounting /etc (nfs read only) and md > whiteout any problems. I’m not sure if i tested it on 11, but i will soon. > yes, it can be problematic for other crazy things, but in my case, where many of > my hosts are dataless so the unionfs is a great simplifier:-) > > just my 2 cents. > I tried to replace nullfs+unionfs with unionfs+unionfs, and got the same messages using the kernel with the same debug options. So it is dangerous. Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?567B4E08.1000204>