From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 4 19:45:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0384516A4CE for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 19:45:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CFD43D5E for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 19:45:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 836925152F; Wed, 4 May 2005 12:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 12:44:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Chuck Robey Message-ID: <20050504194437.GB92026@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050504040349.GA1460@gad.glazov.net> <20050504041730.GA45260@xor.obsecurity.org> <4279128B.9080106@chuckr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4279128B.9080106@chuckr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Vitaly Bogdanov cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Building kernel without some modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 19:45:31 -0000 --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:20:59PM +0000, Chuck Robey wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:03:49AM +0500, Vitaly Bogdanov wrote: > > > >>Hi. > >>Is it possible to build kernel without compiling unnecessary modules? > >>My system - freebsd5.3. > > > > > >See make.conf(5) >=20 > That wasn't very nice. It's not that it's wrong, but the fella sounded= =20 > to me like he was asking if a target existed, and not everyone is=20 > familiar with our make. Responding like you did had the sole function=20 > of trying to shut off any other responses, and was just not helpful at=20 > all to the querent. That's kind of silly. The answer to his question is documented right there in that manpage, so why should I type it out for him? Kris --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCeSYlWry0BWjoQKURAtPLAKD2cUTm4aZg20dGC+9Sw4oXWB1EPgCdGp7m IWIkGdEvYaneSueHEUkrnRo= =wWrg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H--