From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Dec 21 13:39: 3 2000
From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 21 13:39:02 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 030BD37B400; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:39:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ade@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eBLLd1k27397;
	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:39:01 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ade)
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:39:01 -0800 (PST)
From: <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200012212139.eBLLd1k27397@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: ishmael27@home.com, ade@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	ade@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/23716: Patch to make graphics/gdk-pixbuf optionally dependant upon GNOME
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: Patch to make graphics/gdk-pixbuf optionally dependant upon GNOME

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: ade
State-Changed-When: Thu Dec 21 13:34:51 PST 2000
State-Changed-Why: 
As I already explained to you in private email, gdk-pixbuf is, right
now, part of GNOME.  It will disappear as an entity in its own right
real soon now, being combined either into GTK 1.4/2.0 or a future
release of (possibly) gnomelibs.

Whilst it is possible to make this port not dependent on other
GNOME libraries, doing so is likely to cause plenty of headaches
that don't even come close to compensating for the non-GNOME
"capability".


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->ade
Responsible-Changed-By: ade
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Dec 21 13:34:51 PST 2000
Responsible-Changed-Why: 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=23716


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message