Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      23 Jan 1996 08:57:41 -0800
From:      jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra)
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: dhrystone 2.1 result for gcc-2.7.2 with Pentium patches is poor
Message-ID:  <4e3425$e1d@austin.polstra.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960122212225.1522C-100000@knobel.gun.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.BSF.3.91.960122212225.1522C-100000@knobel.gun.de>,
Andreas Klemm  <andreas@knobel.gun.de> wrote:
> On a WWW Server I found a Pentium patch (gcc-2.7.2-2.7.2p-pl6.diff)
> for gcc 2.7.2. My experience with dhrystone 2.1 are, that FreeBSD's
> gcc 2.6.3 is a bit faster ....
> 
> about 163000 Dhrystones with gcc 2.6.3 and "only" 161000 dhrystones
> with the patches gcc 2.7.2 ... poor result. Other experiences ?

I haven't tried those patches, but this kind of thing comes up regularly
in compiler-related newsgroups.  Look: the Dhrystone "benchmark" is
_completely_ worthless and meaningless for today's compilers.  You are
wasting your time messing with it.  It will only mislead you.

John
-- 
   John Polstra                                       jdp@polstra.com
   John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                Seattle, Washington USA
   "Self-knowledge is always bad news."                 -- John Barth



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4e3425$e1d>