Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 May 2006 23:31:29 -0700
From:      "marty fouts" <mf.danger@gmail.com>
To:        noackjr@alumni.rice.edu
Cc:        Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, kmacy@fsmware.com
Subject:   Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
Message-ID:  <9f7850090605262331j352d98acwa3837251300c591b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4477EFDF.80608@alumni.rice.edu>
References:  <20060527024407.GA2525@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4477C401.2080307@rogers.com> <38C8392F-C345-41F7-A879-6C2F5D2C59F5@orthanc.ca> <b1fa29170605262035u4ac8f3jc0a022f335903522@mail.gmail.com> <1B5AEAC9-2A87-40F1-B2D4-2069DCBC30FE@orthanc.ca> <4477EFDF.80608@alumni.rice.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/26/06, Jonathan Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> wrote:
> On 05/27/06 00:05, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > On May 26, 2006, at 8:35 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
> >> Irrelevant. The question is, as a percentage of FreeBSD users, how
> >> many use fortran? A much larger percentage use perl and python, and
> >> those are in ports.
> >
> > My gut feeling is that you just argued for moving the C compiler to
> > ports, too :-(
>
> You're forgetting that the kernel and most of userland are written in C.
>  The C compiler isn't going anywhere...
>
> -Jonathan
>
> --
> Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195
>

I dunno. If you follow this to its logical conclusion, since most
people don't compile anything, there's no reason for *any* compiler to
be in the base system.

(removes tongue from cheek)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9f7850090605262331j352d98acwa3837251300c591b>