From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 12:36:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CB216A4CE for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:36:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70AB943D36 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:35:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 61225 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Dec 2003 20:35:55 -0000 Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:35:55 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: Guido van Rooij In-Reply-To: <20031214202832.GA96797@gvr.gvr.org> Message-ID: <20031214123440.R61189@root.org> References: <20031209114400.G43006@root.org> <20031212185907.GA61783@gvr.gvr.org> <20031212135444.B53967@root.org> <20031214202832.GA96797@gvr.gvr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: "Sergey A. Osokin" cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:36:26 -0000 On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Guido van Rooij wrote: > > into what we do differently. It appears only S1 and S5 are working for > > Linux. > > They have a working OS S4 implementation though. No, swusp is not ACPI-based. It can be used without ACPI. If you'd like to implement swusp for freebsd, be my guest. -Nate