Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:08:02 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Staging issue with staging of net-im/libpurple (libtool?) Message-ID: <20140521120802.5b337fad@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <537C7161.20205@bsdforen.de> References: <CAN6yY1to8mZ9aw_cikEDJH42EVLMuBbEVZZ19SpOcGUQjDTZkA@mail.gmail.com> <20140520085544.GB69382@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20140520140945.1383e5e2@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140520121449.GA70272@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20140520145559.4aed52a5@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140520143904.GA70855@pcjas.obspm.fr> <CAN6yY1vm3O7evs_1zVO-LcERia5Vh7VgYPdU6FFp8J=LoqQg3g@mail.gmail.com> <20140520221340.17ba4c56@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <537C7161.20205@bsdforen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:26:57 +0200 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 20/05/2014 22:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2014 08:52:46 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> Removed the FIND and re-built. After the build I looked in
>>> stage/usr/local/lib and the .so.0 files are still present! I then installed
>>> with no errors. I'll admit that I don't understand what is happening or why
>>> the touch of the files would break things, but it seems to be fixed, now.
>>
>> The touch didn't always give all files the same timestamp so sometimes
>> make thought the configure script was out of date and regenerated it
>> erasing any patches that had been applied to it.
>
> I figure something like:
> find FOO -exec touch {} +
>
> would do the trick.
No, that would run a separate touch for every file. The touch command
just needs an explicit time (with -r or -t flag).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140521120802.5b337fad>