From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 6 07:24:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160C016A41F for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 07:24:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@gneto.com) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C0043D53 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 07:24:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@gneto.com) Received: from as6-1-5.kr.m.bonet.se ([83.227.181.30] [83.227.181.30]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050806072416.PTBA11632.mxfep01.bredband.com@as6-1-5.kr.m.bonet.se> for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 09:24:16 +0200 Received: from [192.168.10.11] (euklides.gneto.com [192.168.10.11]) by as6-1-5.kr.m.bonet.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CA2678B9 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 09:24:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42F4659F.5030407@gneto.com> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:24:15 +0200 From: Martin Nilsson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050724) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <42F45923.2080401@gneto.com> In-Reply-To: <42F45923.2080401@gneto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Something is very wrong with disk caching in 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 07:24:18 -0000 Martin Nilsson wrote: > > This can't be rigt, why are active processes swapped out just to use > the memory for caching a file that is written to once! The box have > 2.5GB memory, it should be plenty for this! Some serching reveals that this is the same bug as Julian found 07/28. Re: VFS/VM over-runs. Was: Apparent strange disk behaviour in 6.0 Who is working on this? It should be put on the TODO for 6.0 so it's not lost. /Martin