Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:26:04 +0100 From: Frederic Culot <culot@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r376964 - head/www/piwik Message-ID: <20150113162604.GA39684@culot.org> In-Reply-To: <20150113161032.GA64798@FreeBSD.org> References: <201501131604.t0DG4vFT079135@svn.freebsd.org> <20150113161032.GA64798@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Alexey, > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:04:57PM +0000, Frederic Culot wrote: > > New Revision: 376964 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/376964 > > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r376964/ > > > > Log: > > - Update to 2.10.0 > > > > Changes: http://piwik.org/changelog/piwik-2-10-0/ > > PR: ports/196524 > > Per https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=ports/196524: > > 'ports/196524' is not a valid bug number nor an alias to a bug. > > In case you didn't notice, FreeBSD had moved from GNATS to Bugzilla quite > a while ago. Old PR attribution is now plain wrong. as the portmgr-secretary I did notice this change indeed, having described it in several reports already. What I did wrong here is to keep the 'ports/' prefix in front of the PR number (old habits die hard...). Once removed, the link is correct: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196524 > > ./danfe > > P.S. This was brought up on our svn-* lists several times. Don't we > have an obligation for all committers to follow their particular list? I assure you that I take my secretary position very seriously and even with the high workload I experience at my $JOB these days I try my best to follow all ports-related lists. Cheers, Frederic
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150113162604.GA39684>