From owner-freebsd-hardware  Sat Aug 30 19:14:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA12951
          for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 30 Aug 1997 19:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp20.portal.net.au [202.12.71.120])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA12934;
          Sat, 30 Aug 1997 19:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1])
	by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA00788;
	Sun, 31 Aug 1997 11:43:14 +0930 (CST)
Message-Id: <199708310213.LAA00788@word.smith.net.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: mjacob@feral.com
cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG,
        richard@pegasus.com
Subject: Re: Is this (SCSI) tape drive compatible with FreeBSD? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 1997 17:15:39 MST."
             <199708310015.RAA00360@ns.feral.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 11:43:12 +0930
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>  >A 250meg capacity is awfully small today, and the tapes are too expensive.
> >They're also excruciatingly slow.
> 
> This isn't even 250Meg. It's QIC-120 (120Meg) or QIC-150.
> 

The Viper 150 will happily read and write the 250 and 525MB 
extended-length tapes.

(Yes I have one, yes, I have used these tapes).

Whilst the criticism that these drives are "slow" and the tapes 
"expensive" is not entirely without basis, it's worth bearing in mind 
that these drives are *robust*, and properly stored the media are very 
stable.

You won't find this in any current drive or media except (perhaps) a 
DLT.

mike