Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:54:56 -0500 From: Sean McAfee <smcafee@collaborativefusion.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible duplicate port - www/pecl-http vs. www/pecl-pecl_http Message-ID: <4B0C1DF0.2000503@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <4B0C1CC4.70701@collaborativefusion.com> References: <4B0C1CC4.70701@collaborativefusion.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sean McAfee wrote:
> It appears that these two ports are actually duplicates.
>
> pecl-pecl_http appears to have a more fleshed out Makefile, but hasn't
> been updated to the new version.
>
> I'd normally go all Columbo on the commits and try to track it down, but
> don't have the time right now.
>
> I figured I'd put it out on list/to maintainers before doing a PR.
>
The maintainer of pecl-pecl_http is currently unreachable, so he likely
won't be able to chime in:
UNDELIVERABLE MAIL
Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered:
<zaa@zaa.pp.ru>:
mail.zaa.pp.ru [127.0.0.1]:
>>> >>> DATA
<<< 546 Routing loop detected -- too many Received: headers.
--
Sean McAfee
Senior Systems Engineer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B0C1DF0.2000503>