From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 24 17:54:57 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAE6106566B
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:54:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smcafee@collaborativefusion.com)
Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com
	(mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA3B8FC18
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:54:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.163] (icepick.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com
	[192.168.2.163])
	(AUTH: LOGIN smcafee, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA)
	by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:54:57 -0500
	id 00056405.000000004B0C1DF1.0000852F
Message-ID: <4B0C1DF0.2000503@collaborativefusion.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:54:56 -0500
From: Sean McAfee <smcafee@collaborativefusion.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090902)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@freebsd.org
References: <4B0C1CC4.70701@collaborativefusion.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B0C1CC4.70701@collaborativefusion.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Possible duplicate port - www/pecl-http vs. www/pecl-pecl_http
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:54:58 -0000

Sean McAfee wrote:
> It appears that these two ports are actually duplicates.
> 
> pecl-pecl_http appears to have a more fleshed out Makefile, but hasn't 
> been updated to the new version.
> 
> I'd normally go all Columbo on the commits and try to track it down, but 
> don't have the time right now.
> 
> I figured I'd put it out on list/to maintainers before doing a PR.
> 

The maintainer of pecl-pecl_http is currently unreachable, so he likely 
won't be able to chime in:

                            UNDELIVERABLE MAIL

Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered:

<zaa@zaa.pp.ru>:
     mail.zaa.pp.ru [127.0.0.1]:
 >>> >>> DATA
<<< 546 Routing loop detected -- too many Received: headers.

-- 
Sean McAfee
Senior Systems Engineer