From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 18:48:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753D316A41F for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:48:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449D843D70 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so136604nfe for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:48:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=boTREoaxev+2/194BG4+vUG8hnpHlyVjiFpGiZkLn22Ns8NvJq/3mq/Ufi76m0aMDHgz/4c8vDbTez09sHpd0LtRAk1IZLT8bqJxmL4eLlQeh+r/L90Tvyv/NrxHiHth9tbbyhvKKADBt7MWX6ZIEhSWVzJMI4xarBfox/Njgxg= Received: by 10.48.233.1 with SMTP id f1mr102872nfh; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:48:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.225.9 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:48:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:48:04 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: Ian Moore In-Reply-To: <200512071741.57495.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200512071741.57495.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing maximum number of groups in FBSD - is it feasible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:48:21 -0000 On 12/7/05, Ian Moore wrote: > Hi, > > I'm toying with the idea of increasing the maximum number of groups a use= r can > belong to on one of my servers - we have a rather complex organisation an= d > we're hitting the 15 group limit for some people. Have you considered cascading groups? That's the normal workaround on Enterprise Unix systems like HP-UX and Solaris. Instead of putting everyong in "group", do this instead. group:*:100:group1,group2 group1:*:101:user1,user2 group2:*:102:user3, user4 Thus, the users are all transitively in group, and you work around the limi= t. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier