From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 18:52:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A129A16A420 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from qpadla@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABCF13C4DD for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from qpadla@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so1092622uge.37 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:52:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=SNf+RTbTcpqVnF+bFdNgH1Xarr3DJch7+PEnLPEMnPM=; b=EBuzShm6HZj8E3/QprX0jsfRVIYtbfdqcuSt2X2lfZ40YM9tVTJb67a3kz+aLzHbd85R+A1+bTOlXeVm+YTm5nc9oZk7uIDVZY9YpRiqu0vwZtBg8OIW1D+Z+2DV13aTbggGxILuK6S1pzuhy5v9iJLP4dFLZn2Z5kbOlnRtsLs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=CJoG6nwB8RckEB+59q9vccQ86D4QkA130QdIt1VZZsigHxOIXcdNG/1rCbknQQ5a+LmdYZ0E0J0TPgdfzBVrWhHLqdsPhUly1bigoq6pVCywQrdnf8Vm00EpoLCEXV+2UzpQQHGEHaIgtmNA21iiXPz9CVceipTpCnf+LEwe7aY= Received: by 10.67.116.7 with SMTP id t7mr4377062ugm.38.1202410374581; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:52:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from atlas.local ( [89.162.141.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w28sm3100136uge.79.2008.02.07.10.52.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:52:53 -0800 (PST) From: Nikolay Pavlov To: "Joao Barros" Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 20:52:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> <200802071941.23199.qpadla@gmail.com> <70e8236f0802071018n389afa3bu161eaa5c6563cbc0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0802071018n389afa3bu161eaa5c6563cbc0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802072052.56918.qpadla@gmail.com> Cc: Attilio Rao , Yar Tikhiy , Doug Barton , Jeff Roberson , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Scot Hetzel , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: qpadla@gmail.com List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:52:57 -0000 On Thursday 07 February 2008 20:18:42 Joao Barros wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 5:41 PM, Nikolay Pavlov wrote: > > On Thursday 07 February 2008 14:47:41 Eric Anderson wrote: > > > FUSE is slow, requires a port (unless PUFFS is ported, which I've > > > probed about before). > > > > I think this is not an argument: > > http://www.ntfs-3g.org/performance.html > > Eric has valid points. > How relevant is a benchmark on Linux to your argument? But it's a userland application. This page is demonstration of it's potential performance that could be achieved, but were is the FreeBSD NTFS implementation stats? Let me ask you: compered to what FUSE is slow? -- ====================================================================== - Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. <<<----------------------------------- ======================================================================