Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Nov 1996 08:02:07 +0300 (MSK)
From:      "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru>
To:        fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner)
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Figuring out another port's build directory
Message-ID:  <199611040502.IAA03537@nagual.ru>
In-Reply-To: <96Nov3.165528pst.177557@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at "Nov 3, 96 04:55:16 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> My "vat" port depends on include files in the gsm port's build directory.
> I could hardcode in "${PORTSDIR}/audio/gsm/work/gsm-1.0-pl10", but given
> that 2.1.5 had gsm1.0.7 and -current has gsm1.0.10, I'm hesitant to do
> that.  Does anyone see anything wrong with the following Makefile construct
> (other than that it's hairy)?

Ports tracking -current only, so don't bother to configure them
for other versions. Why not use hardcode path?

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@nagual.ru>
http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611040502.IAA03537>