From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 08:26:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA6614D; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h.highsecure.ru (h.highsecure.ru [144.76.31.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B892116; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from medway.cl.cam.ac.uk (medway.cl.cam.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:212:238:21c:c0ff:fe4b:2b85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: vsevolod@highsecure.ru) by h.highsecure.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 129BD3003C0; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:26:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53E87E4B.5090600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:26:51 +0100 From: Vsevolod Stakhov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman , Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: svn commit: r364287 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel References: <53e39939.55bc.4ca5432c@svn.freebsd.org> <20140807172841.58633e63@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <53E3A468.5050603@FreeBSD.org> <53E3AC0C.5020904@gmx.de> <53E3AD09.2050000@FreeBSD.org> <53E3B3B5.9000104@gmx.de> <53E3B6D8.9080101@FreeBSD.org> <53E590AC.4020105@FreeBSD.org> <53E7A512.8050008@FreeBSD.org> <53E7D193.3090305@FreeBSD.org> <53E7F110.7010105@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53E7F110.7010105@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Tijl Coosemans , Matthias Andree , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:26:55 -0000 On 10/08/14 23:24, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 10/08/2014 21:09, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: >> Nonetheless, doesn't our ports policy defines to bump PORTREVISION in >> all cases that modifies a resulting package? Shlib provides/requires >> changing is definitely such a change. So you blame now pkg that it >> follows the current policy, don't you? > > Bumping PORTREVISION in this situation is the standard policy only > because we previously lacked the tools to update dependent ports on > shlib ABI changes without it. > > Ideally, pkg(8) will be able to make that policy obsolete by automating > away the manual reverse-dependency tracking that should be (but is not > always) being done at the moment. I agree with this. But we need to define the policy of significant fields thus. The pull request I've mentioned previously changes this policy. But I still have no sane comments about it from the ports developers... https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/pull/911 -- Vsevolod Stakhov