From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Sat Oct 31 10:49:03 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B5CA2202B
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82700144C
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t9VAn31g072337
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:49:03 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4
 route behaviour)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:49:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: melifaro@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-196361-2472-TwtiGK51I2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-196361-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-196361-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:49:03 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361

--- Comment #7 from Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to jhujhiti from comment #6)
FreeBSD development model assumes all new features goes to HEAD first and,
after some period of testing, are merged to stable branches if possible.
So, it would be great if this patch can be applied/tested on HEAD - otherwise
it would wouldn't be possible to commit it to FreeBSD.

Note also that HEAD is pretty different in netinet6/ from 10 (and especially
9).
For example, link/interface multicast routes does not exists at all. (removed
from HEAD in r273742 and r274346)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.