From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  3 21:29:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686E7106564A;
	Tue,  3 Jul 2012 21:29:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDEE14E970;
	Tue,  3 Jul 2012 21:29:28 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4FF36438.2030902@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:29:28 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120621 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
References: <4FF319A2.6070905@FreeBSD.org> <4FF361CA.4000506@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120703214419.GC92445@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
In-Reply-To: <20120703214419.GC92445@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10G forwarding performance @Intel
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:29:29 -0000

On 07/03/2012 14:44, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:19:06PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Just curious ... what's the MTU on your FreeBSD box, and the Linux box?
> 
> he is (correctly) using min-sized packets, and counting packets not  bps.

Yes, I know. That wasn't what I asked.


-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection