From owner-freebsd-current Sat Oct 2 22: 0:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E95D14F4F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 22:00:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id WAA18797; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 22:05:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) From: Steve Kargl Message-Id: <199910030505.WAA18797@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: new sigset_t and upgrading: a proposal In-Reply-To: <99100219475100.45272@nomad.dataplex.net> from Richard Wackerbarth at "Oct 2, 1999 07:30:45 pm" To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 22:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > Why isn't the kernel BUILT automatically as a part of "buildworld"? > Except for the fact that the object directory is in the wrong place, why isn't > a kernel just like any other module? > This may be difficult. Which kernel do you build? I use the same source tree for two very different machines. So, should it build GENERIC, CUSTOM1, or CUSTOM2? -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message