From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 3 17:43:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182841065670 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 17:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f195.google.com (mail-qy0-f195.google.com [209.85.221.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48AB8FC18 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 17:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so3068312qyk.28 for ; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:43:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pzKwK8O9A7wPhYSONGMED4HVK8Aob/0tTkb9QMhl/s4=; b=LxxcB3QjY/pPywiTaum60I6PHZxzjNQY+8FQgR0V4OpVw0lR/l9JCCJ1knfrmMQ614 NPPdDdW9VThlp9LJd8oz24A0BxYErtsUCxxUHuPDt52/KCzG2V0i2WmskBQ/fAlc40qq mm+X42cXhOf2qVXI2ng5t5xmSBGeKFCNm8DiU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mW/eKrgjYPTKNj5g6RTXEMpuV43Ih5SwO6XCnhg6G1QReUfIHSwuZQrG6cDEKTkQ6U FRo2aOCkyIzUI4YdTlkDViKoTxzOM1X4NxH6ebGJVlvX4qumYl5P33nvHEC9WmulEK0+ a5FTlFga7FDBP/mJ2u1CtZJxB9ALaLTZDfcEc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.82.14 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 10:43:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:43:40 -0600 Received: by 10.229.184.130 with SMTP id ck2mr5513488qcb.95.1270316620943; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: IPFW and Fail2Ban X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:43:42 -0000 On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Carmel NY wrote: > > > Nothing at all, I am just exploring other avenues. Fail2Ban can > potentially block more attacks than denyhosts can though. > In what way? denyhosts can do more than simply ssh monitoring/blocking. It has a plugin system for extensibility. -- Adam Vande More