Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 17:52:32 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: kono@kth.se, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@freebsd.kde.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] kile crashes after port upgrade on amd64 Message-ID: <1146844352.43239.43.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060505184411.65810ab4@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200605041642.23055.kono@kth.se> <200605051540.24237.groot@kde.org> <20060505184411.65810ab4@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ion-Mihai Tetcu p=ED=B9e v p=E1 05. 05. 2006 v 18:44 +0300:
> On Fri, 5 May 2006 15:40:19 +0200
> Adriaan de Groot <groot@kde.org> wrote:
>=20
> > On Thursday 04 May 2006 16:42, Alexander Konovalenko wrote:
> > > I noticed that at least two dependencies were upgraded: lua-5.0.2.1 a=
nd
> > > fontconfig-2.3.2_3,1 to lua-5.1 and fontconfig-2.3.2_4 respectively. =
I
> > > don't know if it is a problem.
> >=20
> > Someone mentioned this on IRC, but it's not been reported or mentioned =
except=20
> > for your mail message. So if you track it down, that'd be most useful.=20
> > Otherwise "yeah, maybe" is all we can give you.
>=20
> lua, see ports/96819.
> Sorry that I didn't have the time to track it down yesterday.
portupgrade -f -o lang/lua50 lua-5.1
I haven't figured out the method to tell portupgrade to leave lua 5.0
alone if it's recorded as a dependency on kate. The kate port itself
points to correct lua port, lua50.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
How will you recognize experienced hacker from beginner?
Beginner thinks that kilobyte have 1000 bytes.
Experienced hacker thinks one kilometer have 1024 meters.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1146844352.43239.43.camel>