Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Jan 2000 15:15:56 -0800
From:      Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>
To:        Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
Cc:        Lowell Gilbert <lowell@world.std.com>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/13644
Message-ID:  <20000126151556.E73462@sturm.canonware.com>
In-Reply-To: <388F7DDD.EFB73428@softweyr.com>; from wes@softweyr.com on Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:06:05PM -0700
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001261505140.31955-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <388F3254.CF5F1C41@softweyr.com> <rd64sc0v9ce.fsf@world.std.com> <388F7DDD.EFB73428@softweyr.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:06:05PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> Cut and paste in X still tends to mangle tabs and such.  vi and xterm make
> a workable environment, Emacs makes a better one.  I'd love to see something
> better come along, but I've been waiting for that for a number of years.

screen (ports/misc/screen) does wonders for the type of work environment
you're describing in combination with vi.  Personally, I'm a hard-core
emacs user, but xterm/screen/vi is actually an appealing alternative.

Seriously, check screen out.  It is *very* worth spending a few hours to
get used to it.

Jason


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000126151556.E73462>